Original post on Solidot
2025-06-05
蓬勃发展的克隆动物生意
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-05, 3:36 - 网址小屋
2025-06-05
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-05, 3:36 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-05, 1:50 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-05, 11:25 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
2025-06-04
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-04, 11:49 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-04, 10:42 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-04, 10:11 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-04, 9:46 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-04, 9:33 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
作者 Solidot Girl (Repost) (Solidot) 于 2025-06-04, 5:53 - 网址小屋
Original post on Solidot
2014-02-15
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 12:58 - 网址小屋
Comments: "The End of Mrs. and Miss"
URL: http://codebyjeff.com/blog/2014/02/the-end-of-mrs-and-miss
The end of Mrs and Miss 2014-02-15
Morten Rand-Hendriksen (@mor10) asked an excellent question on Twitter today:
I never understood why women are required to prefix their names based on marital status. Mrs., Miss, Ms. #archaic So why do we still have the options of Miss and Mrs.? Why do we need these prefixes at all?
Of course, Ms. has been around for years, and is thoroughly accepted, and yet: We still see these older prefixes on forms and never stop to question it.
Why ARE we asking for these prefixes?
There has been a tremendous amount of attention paid lately to gender equality in the programming world, which is an excellent thing. I've actually for the most part stayed out of the conversation, mostly because I'm a bit older than most programmers (I can remember, as a child, the "bra-burning days"). What may seem to you like a brand new conversation is actually an old one going through another iteration, as we wind closer and closer to our final destination of true, in our hearts and minds rather than just our words, Equality.
The most difficult part of these changes, I've always felt, has not really been the obvious cases. Most of us know better than to tell racist jokes at a party or make comments like, "Women can't do X". Most importantly, though, the environment has changed sufficiently that we are not afraid to show our disapproval of that sort of behavior. In most situations, you no longer feel the need to laugh or go along with things. (You may point to the recently breaking story of the Miami Dolphins. I'll contend that 10 years ago, it would have been swept under the rug, and when I was a child, no one would have even thought it worthy of being reported.)
The thing that is very difficult for people not in the minority group to understand is that, where the actual issue lies is usually not in people doing the blatantly bad - the crowd will take care of that - but rather in the environment that is created by the often innocent everyday habits and remarks. We all understand the concept of "atmosphere" - a party that has all the right ingredients, but just doesn't take off; a team of superb players who just can't find the chemistry to win. This is a terribly difficult thing to pin down, and yet this is what determines the ultimate success or failure of a project.
So to tie this back to my original question - why are we asking women to put information on a form that has no use other than to let us know if she might be a potential mate?
Putting it bluntly like that, the problem jumps right out, doesn't it? If we need to know gender - put a gender radio set on your form. If there is a reason to ask marital status, then do the same - for men and women. Don't put a question on the form that implicitly asks, "Please let me know if you have a husband lurking around". Remove this little, old-fashioned question that adds meta data to a woman's record about her status in the world with regards to possible availability for sex. Change that small part of the atmosphere.
Why do I bring this up in a programming blog? Quite simply, because we programmers have the power to affect this particular small change. Most forms these days are online - created by technical people. Us. This little drop in the bucket can be OUR drop, joining with others to change over time how people think about each other.
Here's what I'm asking you to do:
If you make a new form, limit salutations to Dr., Mr., Ms.
If your customer wants Mrs. & Miss, push back. Up to you to decide how far and how hard, but make an effort.
If your current company uses forms that have Mrs. & Miss, propose the field & forms be changed. If you feel your direct boss won't be amenable, consider finding someone in sales or marketing with a bit of clout who might champion the cause
That's it. Not very hard to do. Perhaps 10 years from now, the thought of a form that asks a woman for her marital status for no reason will be met with the same reaction as a sexist joke in a high-level meeting is most places today.
I welcome discussion on this subject on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7242727
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 12:52 - 网址小屋
Comments: "The Dawn of the Age of Artificial Intelligence"
The advances we’ve seen in the past few years—cars that drive themselves, useful humanoid robots, speech recognition and synthesis systems, 3D printers, Jeopardy!-champion computers—are not the crowning achievements of the computer era. They’re the warm-up acts. As we move deeper into the second machine age we’ll see more and more such wonders, and they’ll become more and more impressive.
How can we be so sure? Because the exponential, digital, and recombinant powers of the second machine age have made it possible for humanity to create two of the most important one-time events in our history: the emergence of real, useful artificial intelligence (AI) and the connection of most of the people on the planet via a common digital network.
Either of these advances alone would fundamentally change our growth prospects. When combined, they’re more important than anything since the Industrial Revolution, which forever transformed how physical work was done.
Digital machines have escaped their narrow confines and started to demonstrate broad abilities in pattern recognition, complex communication, and other domains that used to be exclusively human. We’ve recently seen great progress in natural language processing, machine learning (the ability of a computer to automatically refine its methods and improve its results as it gets more data), computer vision, simultaneous localization and mapping, and many other areas.
We’re going to see artificial intelligence do more and more, and as this happens costs will go down, outcomes will improve, and our lives will get better. Soon countless pieces of AI will be working on our behalf, often in the background. They’ll help us in areas ranging from trivial to substantive to life changing. Trivial uses of AI include recognizing our friends’ faces in photos and recommending products. More substantive ones include automatically driving cars on the road, guiding robots in warehouses, and better matching jobs and job seekers. But these remarkable advances pale against the life-changing potential of artificial intelligence.
We’re going to see artificial intelligence do more and more, and as this happens costs will go down, outcomes will improve, and our lives will get better.To take just one recent example, innovators at the Israeli company OrCam have combined a small but powerful computer, digital sensors, and excellent algorithms to give key aspects of sight to the visually impaired (a population numbering more than twenty million in the United States alone). A user of the OrCam system, which was introduced in 2013, clips onto her glasses a combination of a tiny digital camera and speaker that works by conducting sound waves through the bones of the head. If she points her finger at a source of text such as a billboard, package of food, or newspaper article, the computer immediately analyzes the images the camera sends to it, then reads the text to her via the speaker.
Reading text ‘in the wild’—in a variety of fonts, sizes, surfaces, and lighting conditions—has historically been yet another area where humans outpaced even the most advanced hardware and software. OrCam and similar innovations show that this is no longer the case, and that here again technology is racing ahead. As it does, it will help millions of people lead fuller lives. The OrCam costs about $2,500—the price of a good hearing aid—and is certain to become cheaper over time.
Digital technologies are also restoring hearing to the deaf via cochlear implants and will probably bring sight back to the fully blind; the FDA recently approved a first-generation retinal implant. AI’s benefits extend even to quadriplegics, since wheelchairs can now be controlled by thoughts. Considered objectively, these advances are something close to miracles—and they’re still in their infancy.
In addition to powerful and useful AI, the other recent development that promises to further accelerate the second machine age is the digital interconnection of the planet’s people. There is no better resource for improving the world and bettering the state of humanity than the world’s humans—all 7.1 billion of us. Our good ideas and innovations will address the challenges that arise, improve the quality of our lives, allow us to live more lightly on the planet, and help us take better care of one another. It is a remarkable and unmistakable fact that, with the exception of climate change, virtually all environmental, social, and individual indicators of health have improved over time, even as human population has increased.
This improvement is not a lucky coincidence; it is cause and effect. Things have gotten better because there are more people, who in total have more good ideas that improve our overall lot. The economist Julian Simon was one of the first to make this optimistic argument, and he advanced it repeatedly and forcefully throughout his career. He wrote, “It is your mind that matters economically, as much or more than your mouth or hands. In the long run, the most important economic effect of population size and growth is the contribution of additional people to our stock of useful knowledge. And this contribution is large enough in the long run to overcome all the costs of population growth.”
We do have one quibble with Simon, however. He wrote that, “The main fuel to speed the world’s progress is our stock of knowledge, and the brake is our lack of imagination.” We agree about the fuel but disagree about the brake. The main impediment to progress has been that, until quite recently, a sizable portion of the world’s people had no effective way to access the world’s stock of knowledge or to add to it.
In the industrialized West we have long been accustomed to having libraries, telephones, and computers at our disposal, but these have been unimaginable luxuries to the people of the developing world. That situation is rapidly changing. In 2000, for example, there were approximately seven hundred million mobile phone subscriptions in the world, fewer than 30 percent of which were in developing countries.
By 2012 there were more than six billion subscriptions, over 75 percent of which were in the developing world. The World Bank estimates that three-quarters of the people on the planet now have access to a mobile phone, and that in some countries mobile telephony is more widespread than electricity or clean water.
The first mobile phones bought and sold in the developing world were capable of little more than voice calls and text messages, yet even these simple devices could make a significant difference. Between 1997 and 2001 the economist Robert Jensen studied a set of coastal villages in Kerala, India, where fishing was the main industry.10 Jensen gathered data both before and after mobile phone service was introduced, and the changes he documented are remarkable. Fish prices stabilized immediately after phones were introduced, and even though these prices dropped on average, fishermen’s profits actually increased because they were able to eliminate the waste that occurred when they took their fish to markets that already had enough supply for the day. The overall economic well-being of both buyers and sellers improved, and Jensen was able to tie these gains directly to the phones themselves.
Now, of course, even the most basic phones sold in the developing world are more powerful than the ones used by Kerala’s fisherman over a decade ago. And cheap mobile devices keep improving. Technology analysis firm IDC forecasts that smartphones will outsell feature phones in the near future, and will make up about two-thirds of all sales by 2017.
This shift is due to continued simultaneous performance improvements and cost declines in both mobile phone devices and networks, and it has an important consequence: it will bring billions of people into the community of potential knowledge creators, problem solvers, and innovators.
Today, people with connected smartphones or tablets anywhere in the world have access to many (if not most) of the same communication resources and information that we do while sitting in our offices at MIT. They can search the Web and browse Wikipedia. They can follow online courses, some of them taught by the best in the academic world. They can share their insights on blogs, Facebook, Twitter, and many other services, most of which are free. They can even conduct sophisticated data analyses using cloud resources such as Amazon Web Services and R, an open source application for statistics.13 In short, they can be full contributors in the work of innovation and knowledge creation, taking advantage of what Autodesk CEO Carl Bass calls “infinite computing.”
Until quite recently rapid communication, information acquisition, and knowledge sharing, especially over long distances, were essentially limited to the planet’s elite. Now they’re much more democratic and egalitarian, and getting more so all the time. The journalist A. J. Liebling famously remarked that, “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” It is no exaggeration to say that billions of people will soon have a printing press, reference library, school, and computer all at their fingertips.
We believe that this development will boost human progress. We can’t predict exactly what new insights, products, and solutions will arrive in the coming years, but we are fully confident that they’ll be impressive. The second machine age will be characterized by countless instances of machine intelligence and billions of interconnected brains working together to better understand and improve our world. It will make mockery out of all that came before.
This post is adapted from Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee's The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies.
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 11:29 - 网址小屋
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 10:29 - 网址小屋
Comments: "The New Normal: 200-400 Gbps DDoS Attacks — Krebs on Security"
URL: http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/02/the-new-normal-200-400-gbps-ddos-attacks/
Over the past four years, KrebsOnSecurity has been targeted by countless denial-of-service attacks intended to knock it offline. Earlier this week, KrebsOnSecurity was hit by easily the most massive and intense such attack yet — a nearly 200 Gpbs assault leveraging a simple attack method that industry experts say is becoming alarmingly common.
At issue is a seemingly harmless feature built into many Internet servers known as the Network Time Protocol (NTP), which is used to sync the date and time between machines on a network. The problem isn’t with NTP itself, per se, but with certain outdated or hard-coded implementations of it that attackers can use to turn a relatively negligible attack into something much, much bigger. Symantec‘s writeup on this threat from December 2013 explains the problem succinctly:
Similar to DNS amplification attacks, the attacker sends a small forged packet that requests a large amount of data be sent to the target IP Address. In this case, the attackers are taking advantage of the monlist command. Monlist is a remote command in older version of NTP that sends the requester a list of the last 600 hosts who have connected to that server. For attackers the monlist query is a great reconnaissance tool. For a localized NTP server it can help to build a network profile. However, as a DDoS tool, it is even better because a small query can redirect megabytes worth of traffic.Matthew Prince, the CEO of Cloudflare — a company that helps Web sites stay online in the face of huge DDoS attacks — blogged Thursday about a nearly 400 Gbps attack that recently hit one of the company’s customers and leveraged NTP amplification. Prince said that while Cloudflare “generally [was] able to mitigate the attack, it was large enough that it caused network congestion in parts of Europe.”
“Monday’s DDoS proved these attacks aren’t just theoretical. To generate approximately 400Gbps of traffic, the attacker used 4,529 NTP servers running on 1,298 different networks,” Prince wrote. “On average, each of these servers sent 87Mbps of traffic to the intended victim on CloudFlare’s network. Remarkably, it is possible that the attacker used only a single server running on a network that allowed source IP address spoofing to initiate the requests. An attacker with a 1 Gbps connection can theoretically generate more than 200Gbps of DDoS traffic.”
NO TIME LIKE THE PRESENT
Prince suggests a number of solutions for cleaning up the problem that permits attackers to seize control over so many ill-configured NTP servers, and this is sound advice. But what that post does not mention is the reality that a great many of today’s DDoS attacks are being launched or coordinated by the same individuals who are running DDoS-for-hire services (a.k.a “booters”) which are hiding behind Cloudflare’s own free cloud protection services.
As I noted in a talk I gave last summer with Lance James at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas, a funny thing happens when you decide to operate a DDoS-for-hire Web service: Your service becomes the target of attacks from competing DDoS-for-hire services. Hence, a majority of these services have chosen to avail themselves of Cloudflare’s free content distribution service, which generally does a pretty good job of negating this occupational hazard for the proprietors of DDoS services.
Mr. Prince took strong exception to my remarks at Black Hat, which observed that this industry probably would destroy itself without Cloudflare’s protection, and furthermore that some might perceive a credibility issue with a company that sells DDoS protection services providing safe haven to an entire cottage industry of DDoS-for-hire services.
Prince has noted that while Cloudflare will respond to legal process and subpoenas from law enforcement to take sites offline, “sometimes we have court orders that order us to not take sites down.” Indeed, one such example was CarderProfit, a Cloudflare-protected carding forum that turned out to be an elaborate sting operation set up by the FBI.
He said the company has a stated policy of not singling out one type of content over another, citing a fear of sliding down a slippery slope of censorship.
In a phone interview today, Prince emphasized that he has seen no indication that actual malicious packets are being sent out of Cloudflare’s network from the dozens of booter service Web sites that are using the service. Rather, he said, those booter services are simply the marketing end of these operations.
“The very nature of what we are trying to build is a system by which any content can be online and we can make denial-of-service attacks a thing of the past. But that means that some controversial content will end up on our network. We have an attack of over 100 Gbps almost every hour of every day. If I really thought it would solve the problem, and if our network was actually being used in these attacks, that’s a no-brainer. But I can’t get behind the idea that we should deny service to a marketing site just so that it can be attacked by these other sites, and that this will will somehow make the problem go away. I don’t think that’s right, and it starts us down a slippery slope.”
As a journalist, I’m obviously extremely supportive of free speech rights. But it seems to me that most of these DDoS-for-hire services are — by definition — all about stifling speech. Worse yet, over the past few months the individuals behind these offerings have begun to latch onto NTP attacks, said Allison Nixon, a researcher for NTT Com Security who spoke about DDoS protection bypass techniques at last year’s Black Hat.
“There is a growing awareness of NTP based attacks in the criminal underground in the past several months,” Nixon said. “I believe it’s because nobody realized just how many vulnerable servers are out there until recently. “The technical problem of NTP amplification has been known for a long time. Now that more and more attack lists are being traded around, the availability of DDoS services with NTP attack functionality is on the rise.”
(S)KIDS JUST WANNA HAVE FUN
The shocking thing about these DDoS-for-hire services is that — as I’ve reported in several previous stories — a majority of them are run by young kids who apparently can think of no better way to prove how cool and “leet” they are than by wantonly knocking Web sites offline and by launching hugely disruptive assaults. Case in point: My site appears to have been attacked this week by a 15-year-old boy from Illinois who calls himself “Mr. Booter Master” online.
Prolexic Technologies, the company that has been protecting KrebsOnSecurity from DDoS attacks for the past 18 months, said the attack that hit my site this week clocked in just shy of 200 Gbps. A year or two ago, a 200 Gbps attack would have been close to the largest attack on record, but the general upswing in attack volume over the past year makes the biggest attacks timeline look a bit like a hockey stick, according to a blog post on NTP attacks posted today by Arbor Networks. Arbor’s writeup speaks volumes about the motivations and maturity of the individuals behind a majority of these NTP attacks.
The NTP attack on my site was short-lived — only about 10 minutes in duration, according to Prolexic. That suggested the attack was little more than a proof-of-concept, a demonstration.
Indeed, shortly after the attack subsided, I heard from a trusted source who closely monitors hacker activity in the cybercrime underground. The source wanted to know if my site had recently been the subject of a denial-of-service attack. I said yes and asked what he knew about it. The source shared some information showing that someone using the nickname “Rasbora” had very recently posted several indicators in a private forum in a bid to prove that he had just launched a large attack against my site.
Apparently, Rasbora did this so that he could prove his greatness to the administrators of Darkode, a closely guarded cybercrime forum that has been profiled at length in this blog. Rasbora was anxious to show what he could contribute to the Darkode community, and his application for membership there hinged in part on whether he could be successful in taking down my site (incidentally, this is not the first time Darkode administrators have used my site as a test target for vetting prospective members who apply based on the strength of some professed DDoS prowess).
Rasbora, like other young American kids involved in DDoS-for-hire services, hasn’t done a great job of separating his online self from his real life persona, and it wasn’t long before I was speaking to Rasbora’s dad. His father seemed genuinely alarmed — albeit otherwise clueless — to learn about his son’s alleged activities. Rasbora himself agreed to speak to me, but denied that he was responsible for any attack on my site. He did, however, admit to using the nickname Rasbora — and eventually — to being consumed with various projects related to DDoS activities.
Rasbora maintains a healthy presence on Hackforums[dot]net, a relatively open forum that is full of young kids engaged in selling hacking services and malicious code of one kind or another. Throughout 2013, he ran a DDoS-for-hire service hidden behind Cloudflare called “Flashstresser.net,” but that service is currently unreachable. These days, Rasbora seems to be taking projects mostly by private contract.
Rasbora’s most recent project just happens to be gathering, maintaining huge “top quality” lists of servers that can be used to launch amplification attacks online. Despite his insistence that he’s never launched DDoS attacks, Rasbora did eventually allow that someone reading his posts on Hackforums might conclude that he was actively involved in DDoS attacks for hire.
“I don’t see what a wall of text can really tell you about what someone does in real life though,” said Rasbora, whose real-life identity is being withheld because he’s a minor. This reply came in response to my reading him several posts that he’d made on Hackforums not 24 hours earlier that strongly suggested he was still in the business of knocking Web sites offline: In a Feb. 12 post on a thread called “Hiring a hit on a Web site” that Rasbora has since deleted, he tells a fellow Hackforums user, “If all else fails and you just want it offline, PM me.”
Rasbora has tried to clean up some of his more self-incriminating posts on Hackforums, but he remains defiantly steadfast in his claim that he doesn’t DDoS people. Who knows, maybe his dad will ground him and take away his Internet privileges.
Tags: Allison Nixon, Arbor Networks, CloudFlare, Darkode, Hackforums, Lance James, Matthew Prince, network time protocol, NTP, NTT Com Security, Prolexic Technologies, Rasbora, Symantec
This entry was posted on Friday, February 14th, 2014 at 7:13 pm and is filed under A Little Sunshine, The Coming Storm. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a comment. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 9:52 - 网址小屋
Comments: "Why I Dropped Out Of YC | wikichen"
URL: http://wikichen.is/writing/why-i-dropped-out-of-yc/
I bought my first Moleskine by sheer coincidence while shopping for craft supplies that a design course had required; I had avoided buying a notebook for the first two years at university by resourcefully (for which some might argue was born out of necessity from the lazy frugality of your average college kid) removing stacks of printer paper from the student center under a well-rehearsed, convincing ruse that I was somehow heroically fixing a “paper jam”.
By my third year I was making enough money from being a resident advisor and scrapping by with a delightful hodgepodge of research jobs that I could finally renounce my thieving ways and afford some decent stationeries, one of which was a proper notebook on which I could keep notes. I’m going to be taking actual notes in an actual notebook like a Shakespearean boss, I thought as I browsed the notebook section in the art supplies store. I picked the most conventional looking one from the pile: a large Moleskine Classic Notebook with a hard cover and plain, white pages. I knew not what a Moleskine was then or of its more hipster connotations (I swear) or why it cost an arm and leg for one, but I was pleased to have something I could, at long last, take notes on that’s not single sheet and A4-sized.
Naturally, those notes turned out to be nothing but the wild swirling caricatures of a sleep-deprived procrastinator nodding off every few minutes as the professor droned on. But over time that first Moleskine served as an outlet for my creative self, a blank canvas I painted with my thoughts and ideas and dreams. It captured the moments of blinding clarity and paroxysms of fleeting epiphany that so often defined checkpoints of my personal growth. More importantly, the notebook embodied me at my best and dutifully provided a record from which I could reflect and study.
I filled up that very same Moleskine at the end of last year, around the time when I decided to join the startup as she made the transition to the Bay Area after being accepted into Y Combinator. The fortuitous signs of a full notebook greeting a new opportunity in a new year got the best of my superstitious tendencies, so I ordered a brand-spanking new one off Amazon. In the five or so weeks since Y Combinator commenced in full swing, I haven’t written anything in the Moleskine. In fact, it’s still sitting on my shelf, wrapped in its original packaging.
Earlier this week we met with our advisor and YC partner Aaron over what seemed to be a divergence in the direction of the company and the underlying disagreement on how to best solve problems. In the hour we talked, what surfaced instead was an irreconcilable working relationship rooted in fundamental differences in personalities and misaligned expectations of roles and responsibilities. There were no hard feelings, just hard lessons learned.
Maybe I signed up for the wrong thing or for the wrong reason, as well-intentioned as I was from the start. Maybe it was more about Y Combinator, the subject of numerous pages in my Moleskine, and that was wrong. Maybe in the wake of a failed startup I deluded myself into thinking great teams are predicated on great friendships, a truism that no longer holds absolute truth.
It was also the acceptance that the startup would never be something I could call my own, not just in stake but in equal say, that cemented my decision to walk away. A sense of ownership can be a powerful motivator for a startup; in this case the lack thereof tore it apart. But if you asked me for the one reason why it didn’t work out, the truth is that it just wasn’t fun anymore, and when you’re grinding away on an early stage venture with no pay, the enjoyment you derive from working with your partners is all you have.
Egos clashed and convictions shaken, we came to the consesnsus that it’d be best if I part ways with the startup. To some extent I was relieved, freed from an incompatible environment that brought no party joy, and it hardly mattered that, to those like me who held the institution on a pedestal, this is Y Combinator we’re talking about. Aaron put it this way, “Stop thinking about YC. YC is an artificial construct, a forcing function that augments a startup’s chances to succeed. But if you can’t work together, then none of it matters. If someone tells me I can do YC but I’ll have to wear hot pants the whole time, I wouldn’t do it.” And I wholeheartedly agree with him: life’s too short to wear hot pants.
It’s been a few days since my departure, and I’m as uncertain as ever regarding my next steps, largely given that I’m still digesting what I’ve learned from this experience, and partly because I’ve grown jaded and disillusioned with Silicon Valley at large. What’s certain is that I won’t be touching startups for a very long time, and I might even stay away from Hacker News for a while. If anything, when the time comes and that startup itch manifests itself again, I’ve taken to heart that it will be of my own creation, with a team I can entrust equal ownership, and on my own terms, Y Combinator or not.
Taking the new Moleskine from the shelf and removing it from its plastic wrap, I turned to the first blank page and picked up my pen.
Here we go again.
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 9:29 - 网址小屋
Comments: "95% of Climate Models Agree: The Observations Must be Wrong « Roy Spencer, PhD"
URL: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/95-of-climate-models-agree-the-observations-must-be-wrong/
I’m seeing a lot of wrangling over the recent (15+ year) pause in global average warming…when did it start, is it a full pause, shouldn’t we be taking the longer view, etc.
These are all interesting exercises, but they miss the most important point: the climate models that governments base policy decisions on have failed miserably.
I’ve updated our comparison of 90 climate models versus observations for global average surface temperatures through 2013, and we still see that >95% of the models have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH):
Whether humans are the cause of 100% of the observed warming or not, the conclusion is that global warming isn’t as bad as was predicted. That should have major policy implications…assuming policy is still informed by facts more than emotions and political aspirations.
And if humans are the cause of only, say, 50% of the warming (e.g. our published paper), then there is even less reason to force expensive and prosperity-destroying energy policies down our throats.
I am growing weary of the variety of emotional, misleading, and policy-useless statements like “most warming since the 1950s is human caused” or “97% of climate scientists agree humans are contributing to warming”, neither of which leads to the conclusion we need to substantially increase energy prices and freeze and starve more poor people to death for the greater good.
Yet, that is the direction we are heading.
And even if the extra energy is being stored in the deep ocean (if you have faith in long-term measured warming trends of thousandths or hundredths of a degree), I say “great!”. Because that extra heat is in the form of a tiny temperature change spread throughout an unimaginably large heat sink, which can never have an appreciable effect on future surface climate.
If the deep ocean ends up averaging 4.1 deg. C, rather than 4.0 deg. C, it won’t really matter.
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 8:29 - 网址小屋
Comments: "Sublimall"
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 8:05 - 网址小屋
Comments: "kimono : The kimono blog"
URL: http://kimonify.kimonolabs.com/kimload?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkimonolabs.com%2Fcrawlblog%2F1
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 7:48 - 网址小屋
Comments: "Jet Propulsion Laboratory | News"
URL: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/m/news/news.php?release=2014-051
February 14, 2014
Researchers have determined the now-infamous Martian rock resembling a jelly doughnut, dubbed Pinnacle Island, is a piece of a larger rock broken and moved by the wheel of NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity in early January.
Only about 1.5 inches wide (4 centimeters), the white-rimmed, red-centered rock caused a stir last month when it appeared in an image the rover took Jan. 8 at a location where it was not present four days earlier.
More recent images show the original piece of rock struck by the rover's wheel, slightly uphill from where Pinnacle Island came to rest.
"Once we moved Opportunity a short distance, after inspecting Pinnacle Island, we could see directly uphill an overturned rock that has the same unusual appearance," said Opportunity Deputy Principal Investigator Ray Arvidson of Washington University in St. Louis. "We drove over it. We can see the track. That's where Pinnacle Island came from."
Examination of Pinnacle Island revealed high levels of elements such as manganese and sulfur, suggesting these water-soluble ingredients were concentrated in the rock by the action of water. "This may have happened just beneath the surface relatively recently," Arvidson said, "or it may have happened deeper below ground longer ago and then, by serendipity, erosion stripped away material above it and made it accessible to our wheels."
Now that the rover is finished inspecting this rock, the team plans to drive Opportunity south and uphill to investigate exposed rock layers on the slope.
Opportunity is approaching a boulder-studded ridge informally named the McClure-Beverlin Escarpment, in honor of engineers Jack Beverlin and Bill McClure. Beverlin and McClure were the first recipients of the NASA Medal of Exceptional Bravery for their actions on Feb. 14, 1969, to save NASA's second successful Mars mission, Mariner 6, when the launch vehicle began to crumple on the launch pad from loss of pressure.
"Our team working on Opportunity's continuing mission of exploration and discovery realizes how indebted we are to the work of people who made the early missions to Mars possible, and in particular to the heroics of Bill McClure and Jack Beverlin," said rover team member James Rice of the Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Ariz. "We felt this was really a fitting tribute to these brave men, especially with the 45th anniversary of their actions coming today."
Opportunity's work on the north-facing slope below the escarpment will give the vehicle an energy advantage by tilting its solar panels toward the winter sun. Feb. 14 is the winter solstice in Mars' southern hemisphere, which includes the region where Opportunity has been working since it landed in January 2004.
"We are now past the minimum solar-energy point of this Martian winter," said Opportunity Project Manager John Callas of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. "We now can expect to have more energy available each week. What's more, recent winds removed some dust from the rover's solar array. So we have higher performance from the array than the previous two winters."
During Opportunity's decade on Mars, and the 2004-2010 career of its twin, Spirit, NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Project has yielded a range of findings proving wet environmental conditions on ancient Mars -- some very acidic, others milder and more conducive to supporting life.
JPL manages the Mars Exploration Rover Project for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. For more information about Spirit and Opportunity, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/rovers .
You can follow the project on Twitter and on Facebook at http://twitter.com/MarsRovers and http://www.facebook.com/mars.rovers .
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 7:30 - 网址小屋
Comments: "Venezuelans Blocked on Twitter Amid Opposition’s Protests - Businessweek"
Twitter Inc. (TWTR:US) said the Venezuelan government blocked users’ online images as opposition groups marched through Caracas for a third day, demonstrating against record shortages and the world’s fastest inflation.
Nu Wexler, a Twitter spokesman, confirmed in an e-mail that the government was behind the disruption. President Nicolas Maduro banned protests Feb. 12 and has asked his supporters to counter with a “march against fascism” tomorrow, in a week of social unrest that has left at least three Venezuelans dead.
Related:
In the absence of information from the government or local television outlets, Venezuelans have turned to foreign reporters and social media for news. Twitter users had been posting their photos of demonstrations that started in provincial towns earlier this month, providing an alternative to state-controlled media. It’s unclear if photos are blocked for users of all Internet providers in Venezuela, Wexler said.
“We won’t cease protests until all our comrades are free,” Gaby Arellano, a leader of the Andes University student union and member of the opposition party Voluntad Popular, said by telephone today. “We will continue fighting for our democratic rights.”
Maduro ordered police on Feb. 12 to detain opposition leaders for inciting violence after clashes between opposition-affiliated students and armed pro-government socialist collectives left 66 people injured and 118 under detention, according to the Interior Ministry.
State-run phone company Cia. Anonima Nacional Telefonos de Venezuela SA, or Cantv, denied blocking the images of San Francisco-based Twitter. Twitter’s servers are outside of Venezuela, and other countries experienced the same issue, the company said in an e-mailed statement today.
A spokesman for the Information Ministry, who can’t be named because of internal policy, said he had no problem seeing pictures on his Twitter account, which he uses to follow friends and family.
Students have defied Maduro’s ban on protests, blocking Caracas’ major avenues today on the way to the Eastern Cemetery to bury student Roberto Redman, one of the three killed in Feb. 12 clashes.
Only 10 of the 118 people detained have been charged to-date, mostly for instigating violence, according to the prosecutor general’s office. Human rights group Venezuelan Penal Forum put the number of detained at 148.
Alex Matute, a Caracas-based web developer, said his brother Angel, a 24-year-old student, was among the 30 protesters who were held by the National Guard without being charged and without access to lawyers or family for two days, before being driven to courts.
“We have no idea what they plan to do with him,” Alex Matute said by telephone today. “The police won’t tell us anything.”
A National Guard spokesman, who can’t be named because of internal policy, and Interior Ministry spokesman Marco Hernandez declined to comment, citing national-security risks.
Maduro has accused international outlets of bias. He took Colombian station NTN24 off the air after the protests and in a national address yesterday criticized Agence France Presse for “manipulating information.”
In November, Maduro asked authorities to investigate a disappearance of 6,000 of his 1.4 million Twitter followers, calling it a “massive attack” by the “international right wing.”
Billy Vaisberg, who runs an online directory of Venezuelan Twitter users called TwVen.com, said he had received several reports today from people who couldn’t see images on their feeds. In a post on its Spanish-language account, @twitter_es, Twitter advised Venezuelan users to subscribe to its text-message service to get updates.
“We are having a media blackout,” Josefina Blanco, a freelance science journalist and social media user, said in an e-mail from Caracas. Only because of Twitter, NTN24 and radio station RCR 750, “we can know what is really going on in our streets,” she said.
Inflation more than doubled in Venezuela in the past year to 56.3 percent in January, according to the central bank. At the same time, the central bank’s scarcity index rose to a record 28 percent, meaning that more than one in four basic goods was out of stock at any given time.
Amid the threat of new social unrest, the South American country’s benchmark dollar bond due in 2027 fell 0.67 cent to 64.85 cents on the dollar, near a 30-month low. The yield on the bond rose 16 basis points to 15.53 percent, at 3:40 p.m. in New York.
“The opposition has made a huge progress in the past week, as a couple of student protests have reignited the movement,” David Smilde, a senior fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America, said by telephone from Caracas yesterday. “If in the coming months the economy gets substantially worse and the protests continue, Maduro will be in tough position.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Patricia Laya in Mexico City at playa2@bloomberg.net; Sarah Frier in San Francisco at sfrier1@bloomberg.net; Anatoly Kurmanaev in Caracas at akurmanaev1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Andre Soliani at asoliani@bloomberg.net; Nick Turner at nturner7@bloomberg.net
Original post on Hacker News
作者 Hacker News Girl (Repost) (Hacker News) 于 2014-02-15, 7:22 - 网址小屋
Comments: "Dropbox’s hiring practices explain its lack of female employees"
(Dropbox)
“If someone came in right now and announced that the zombie apocalypse had just started outside, what would you do in the next hour? What is something that you’re geeky about? What is a superpower you would give to your best friend?” These are the types of questions that you could be asked if you apply for a job at Dropbox. Business Insider culled these and other quirky interview questions from a career Web site, Glassdoor.
Dropbox, which provides online storage, is clearly looking for creative people who can think outside the box and wants to make interviews more fun. It is not alone; many Silicon Valley companies ask such questions. The problem is that such questions are fun only for people who understand the jokes — and who can think like the young men doing the interviews.
They don’t lead to better hiring outcomes as Google learned. Its senior vice president for people operations, Laszlo Bock, said last June in an interview with New York Times, “…we found that brainteasers are a complete waste of time. How many golf balls can you fit into an airplane? How many gas stations in Manhattan? A complete waste of time. They don’t predict anything. They serve primarily to make the interviewer feel smart.”
Such hiring practices also disadvantage women. They hurt the employer by limiting the talent pool. They fortify the male dominated frat-boy culture that Silicon Valley is increasingly being criticized for.
Telle Whitney, CEO of Anita Borg Institute, which is working on getting more women to study computer science and have more women fully engaged in creating technology, says its research shows questions such as these cause women to get screened out more often than men. As an example, the superhero concept is going to resonate much more with men, as demonstrated by the demographics of the superhero movie attendance. Whitney cites research which shows that a strong and pervasive stereotype of computer professionals as devoid of a social life alienates women. Subtle cues in the physical environment of companies such as Star Trek posters and video games lead to women being less interested in being a part of an organization when compared to a neutral office environment. This causes women to self-select out of technology jobs.
Indeed, the trend is getting worse. In 1985, 37 percent of computer science undergraduate degree recipients were women. By 2011 this proportion had dropped to 18 percent. Most technology firms refuse to release gender and diversity numbers. Data collected on Github explains why. Dropbox, for example, had only 9 women in its 143 person engineering team as of October 2013. That’s 6.3 percent in an industry in which 18 percent of the hiring pool is women.
Dropbox recently completed $250 million of funding at a valuation close to $10 billion according to the Wall Street Journal. It is rumored to be heading towards an IPO. The company has been expanding its hiring yet the number of women in management is declining. Kim Malone Scott, who headed operations and sales, left in April 2013; Anna Christina Douglas, who headed product marketing, left in August; and VP of Operations Ruchi Sanghvi left the company last October.
Two former female employees and one current employee of Dropbox shared their concerns with me. They asked not to be named because they had signed non-disparagement agreements and feared negative consequences for their careers if they spoke critically of Dropbox. One wrote in an e-mail, “When I interviewed for Dropbox, I was interviewed in a room called ‘The Break-up Room,’ by a male. It was right next to a room called the ‘Bromance Chamber.’ It felt weird I would be interviewed in such a strangely named conference room.” She said that “every time the company holds an all hands ‘goals’ meeting, the only people who talk are men. There are no females in leadership. The highest ranking is a team lead on the User Ops team.”
She spoke up because she believes that “having more females in leadership positions results in more females; when they all leave those positions, it signals poorly to the rest of us.” Freada Kapor Klein, founder of the Level Playing Field Institute, was invited in by Dropbox to talk about hidden bias research and how it may apply to startups. Her husband, Mitch Kapor, also came to the talk as someone who has been a successful entrepreneur and feels that the culture set at the outset of a company is critical. (Coincidentally they became shareholders in Dropbox when the company bought a startup in which they had invested.) Klein says that Dropbox executives, like other startup founders, honestly believe they are a meritocracy and are unaware as to how hidden bias operates. Employee referrals play a large role in their hiring as in most start-ups which further introduces bias and makes the culture exclusionary.
Her advice to Dropbox? “Founders are looking for ‘objective’ measures such as school ranking, GPAs, SAT scores, but fail to recognize that these are biased. Dropbox and other start-ups should pioneer new ways to identify people who can succeed on the core set of job responsibilities. Perhaps a question on how Dropbox might be used to solve income inequality or the unaffordability of housing in San Francisco would reveal as much about someone’s creativity—and more about their character—than questions about superheroes.”
Original post on Hacker News